.
.
S i t e  S e a r c h
.
A_B_C_D_E_F_G_H_I_J_K_L_M_N_O_P_Q_R_S_T_U_V_W_XYZ
.
List of Topics__Ask Suby__Free Stuff__Questions Lists
Terms of Use__________________Privacy Policy
.
...from The LibertyBeacon.com

Two United States Constitutions – 1789 – 1871

By David-William

Anyone who digs through American history can find the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871, when the Crown/Vatican/Swiss Banking Cabal set up to rob everyone of their rights to land, thanks to the Crown Temple B.A.R. Broker/Attorners who made sure to set it all up for their Jesuit Rothschild Lord and Master. All we have known is war, bankruptcy and constant struggles with these Banksters and their Lawyers. A brief account of the history of the end of what we thought was freedom. It's still possible to have freedom, but it's a constant conflict with the loathsome courts.(until October 2025 that is, when the Maritime law they instituted to subjugate people was displaced by Trump, who returned the country to Common Law, based on the most high true God).

The UNITED STATES Incorporated in England in 1871 was governed entirely by private corporate law, dictated by the banks as creditors.

The U.S. is a Crown Colony. The U.S. has always been and remains a Crown.(Roman Catholic Pope).colony.(until changed for the benefit of the people by Trump). King James I, is not just famous for translating the.Bible.into.The King James Version, but for signing the.First Charter of Virginia.in 1606 — which granted America's British forefathers license to settle and colonize America. The charter guaranteed future German Roman Catholic Kings/Queens of England would have sovereign authority over all people and colonized land in America.(they took the land, that is, they stole it).

After America declared independence from the Crown, the.Treaty of Paris, signed on September 3, 1783 was signed. That treaty identifies the German Roman Catholic King of England as prince of U.S.

Prince George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick.(Germany's Brunswick). and Lunebourg.(Germany's Lunebourg), arch-treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire.(Roman Catholic Church).etc. and of the United States of America – completely contradicting.premise that America won The War of Independence. Article 5 of that treaty gave all British estates, rights and properties back to the Crown – Catholic Church Pope.

The Congress realized that the country was in dire financial straits, so they made a financial deal with the devil – the Crown, a.k.a. City of London Corporation – established by the Catholic Church on January 1, 1855, 
thereby incurring a DEBT to the Pope. The conniving Pope and his central bankers were not about to lend the floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a way of taking 
back control of the United States of America and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed. With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia.(Washingtom, DC)

The people of the 50 Union states together maintain foreign sovereign immunity. First, an important point needs to be made clear here. IN LAW, a fictitious.entity can only deal with another fictitious entity, because only parties of equal standing can communicate in law. Read that again!

The UNITED STATES incorporated in England in 1871, because the default again loomed and bankruptcy was imminent. So in 1871, the ten miles square was INCORPORATED in England. They used the 
constitution as their bylaws, not as authority under the Constitution but as authority over the constitution. They CopyRighted, not only the Constitution but also many names such as, THE UNITED 
STATES, U.S. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, USA and many other titles as their own. This is the final blow to the original constitution. From here on out, the UNITED STATES was governed entirely by private corporate law, dictated by the banks as creditors.

More Bankruptcy Reorganizations: Then, in 1909, default loomed once more. The US government went to the Crown of England and asked for an extension of time. This extension was granted for another 
20 years on several conditions. One of the conditions was that the United States allow the creditors to establish a new national bank. This was done in 1913, with the Federal Reserve Bank. This, along with the 16th Amendment, collection of Income tax, enacted February 25, 1913 and the 17th Amendment enacted May 31, 1913, were the conditions for the extension of time. The 16th and 17th Amendment further reduced the states power. The UNITED STATES adopted the Babylonian 'debt money system'.

"The rights of the individual…are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the people of the natiom to the agencies of government."....City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944? 

"A sovereign, the lawgiver, is exempt from suit, not because of any formal conception or obsolete theory, but on the logical and practical ground that there can be no legal right as against the authority that makes 
the law on which the right depends."."A suit presupposes that the defendants are subject to the law invoked. Of course it cannot be maintained unless they are so."....Kawananakoa v. Polyblank (1907) 205 
U.S. 349. 

This is known as the doctrine of Sovereign Immunity. The government uses this all the time to protect itself against lawsuits. They create the statutes and they only agree to be bound by certain statutes. If as a U.S. individual, regarded as a citizen, you do not have that right because you are property of the federal government

However, as a freeborn spirit, an American individual, a living man or woman, you are the creator of the government, so you are immune from suit, unless you agree to waive this right and enter into a suit. Every time you file an legal action in a court, you agree to be bound by the rules of the court and the statutes of the jurisdiction you are acquiescing to. You waive any inalienable.rights you may have and agree to be bound by the statutes
Read that again! Sovereign People defined: the political body, consisting of the entire number of We the People, qualified.electors, who, in their collective capacity, possess the powers of sovereignty and exercise them through their chosen representatives; see Scott v. Sanford, 19 How. 404, 15 L.Ed. 691.]

Black's Law Dictionary Sixth Edition.(page 1396) Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act defined: subject to existing international agreements to which the U.S. is a party and to certain statutorily prescribed 
exceptions, a foreign nation is immune from the jurisdiction of federal and state courts, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1601-1611. Foreign states defined: 
Nations which are outside the United States. Term may also refer to another state; i.e. a sister state.

The term 'foreign nations', as used in a statement of the rule that the laws of foreign nations should be proved in a certain manner, should be construed to mean all nations and states other than that in which 
the action is brought and hence one state of the Union is foreign to another, in the sense of that rule. A 'foreign state' within statute providing for expatriation of Americans who are naturalized under laws 
of a foreign state is a country which is not the United States or its possession or colony, an alien country, other than our own ...Kletter v. Dulles, D.C.D.C., 111 F.Supp. 593, 598.

'Within' defined, 'Into'. In inner or interior part of or 'not longer in time than'. 'Through'. Inside the limits of; during the time of. When used relative to time, has been defined variously as meaning any time before; at or before; at the end of; before the expiration of; not beyond; not exceeding; not later than ...Glenn v. Garrett, Tex.Civ.App., 84 S.W.2d 515, 516. Black's Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 1692)

'Without' defined. 'Outside'; 'beyond'; 'in excess of'. Black's Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 1692). Wherever, under any law of the United States or under any rule, regulation, order or requirement made 
pursuant to law, any matter is required or permitted to be supported, evidenced, established or proved by the sworn declaration, verification, certificate, statement, oath or affidavit, in writing of the individual 
making the same, other than a deposition or an oath of office or an oath required to be taken before a specified official other than a notary public, such matter may, with like force and effect, be supported, 
evidenced, established or proved by the unsworn declaration, certificate, verification or statement, in writing of such individual which is subscribed by him, as true under penalty of perjury and dated, in 
substantially the following form: (1) If executed without the United States: "I declare.(or certify, verify or state).under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true 
and correct. Executed on.(date)..(Signature)." (2) If executed within the United States, its territories, possessions or commonwealths:."I declare.(or certify, verify or state).under penalty of perjury that the 
foregoing is true and correct. Executed on.(date)..(Signature)."

BY-LAWS defined: Rules and ordinances made by a corporation for its own government. The power to make by-laws is usually conferred by express terms of the charter creating the corporation, though, 
when not expressly granted, it is given by implication and it is incident to the very existence of a corporation. When there is an express grant, limited to certain cases and for certain purposes, the corporate 
power of legislation is confined to the objects specified, all others being excluded by implication. ...2 Kyd on Corp. 102; 2 P. Wms. 207; Ang. on Corp. 177. The power of making by-laws, is to be exercised 
by those individuals in whom it is vested by the charter; but if that instrument is silent on that subject, it resides in the members of the corporation at large. ...Harris & Gill's R. 324; 4 Burr. 2515, 2521; 6 Bro. P. 
C. 519. 3. 

The constitution of the United States and acts of congress made in conformity to it the constitution of the state in which a corporation is located and acts of the legislature, constitutionally made, 
together with the common-law as there accepted, are of superior force to any by-law and such by-law, when contrary to either of them, is therefore void, whether the charter authorizes the making of such 
by-law or not; because no legislature can grant power larger than they themselves possess. ...7 Cowen’s R. 585; Id. 604 5 Cowen's R. 538. Vide, generally, Aug. on Corp. ch. 9; Willc. on Corp. ch. 2, s. 3; 
Bac. Ab. h. t.; 4 Vin. Ab. 301 Dane's Ab. Index, h. t., Com. Dig. h. t.; and Id. vol. viii. h. t.

A Law Dictionary Adapted To The Constitution And Laws Of The United States Of America And Of The Several States Of The American Union by John Bouvier Revised Sixth Edition, 1856

BYLAWS defined: Regulations, ordinances, rules or laws adopted by an association or corporation or the like for its internal governance. Bylaws define the rights and obligations of various officers, individuals 
or groups within the corporate structure and provide rules for routine matters such as calling meetings and the like. Most state corporation statutes contemplate that every corporation will adopt bylaws. The 
word is also sometimes used to designate the local laws or municipal statutes of a city or town, though, more commonly the tendency is to employ the word 'ordinance' exclusively for this class of enactments, 
reserving 'by-law' for the rules adopted by corporations. From Black's Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 201)

The United States Constitution is an ordinance or statute within the Law of Nations. The various State constitutions are ordinances or statutes within the United States Constitution and are a part and parcel of the law of Nations. 'Public policy' is within the jurisdiction of the law of Nations. The Law of Nations is the science of the rights, which exist between Nations or State, and of the obligations corresponding to these rights. It will be seen how States, as such, ought to regulate their actions. We shall examine the obligations of a Nation towards itself as well as toward other Nations and in this way we shall determine the rights resulting from those obligations; for since a right is nothing else but the power of doing what is morally possible, that is to say, what is good in itself and conformable to duty, it is clear that right is derived from duty or passive obligation, from the obligation of acting in this manner. A Nation must therefore comprehend the nature of its obligations, not only to avoid acting contrary to its duty, 
but also to obtain there from a clear knowledge of its rights, of what it can lawfully exact from other Nations.

TREATY defined: international law. A treaty is a compact made between two or more independent nations with a view to the public welfare. Treaties are for PERPETUITY or for a considerable time. Those matters which are accomplished by a single act and are at once perfected in their execution, are called agreements, conventions and pactions. On the part of the United States, treaties are made by the president, by and with the consent of the senate, provided two-thirds of the senators present concur. ...Const. article 2, s. 2, n. 2. 3. No state shall enter into any treaty, alliance or confederation; ...Const. art. 1, s. 10, n. 1; nor shall any state, without the consent of congress, enter into any agreement or compact with another state, or with a foreign power. Id. art. 1, see. 10, n. 2; 3 Story on the Const. Sec. 1395. 4. A treaty is declared to be the supreme law of the land, and is therefore obligatory on courts; 1 Cranch, R. 103; 1 Wash. C. C. R. 322 1 Paine, 55; whenever it operates of itself without the aid of a legislative provision; but when the terms of the stipulation import a contract and either of the parties engages to perform a particular act, the treaty addresses itself to the political, not the judicial department and the 
legislature must execute the contract before it can become a rule of the court. 2 Pet. S. C. Rep. 814. Vide Story on the Constitut. Index, h.t.; Serg. Constit. Law, Index, h.t.; 4 Hall’s Law Journal, 461; 6 Wheat. 161: 3 Dall. 199; 1 Kent, Comm. 165, 284. 5. 
   Treaties are divided into personal and real. The personal relate exclusively to the individuals of the contracting parties, such as family alliances and treaties guarantying the throne to a particular sovereign and his family. As they relate to the individuals they expire of course on the death of the sovereign or the extinction of his family. Real treaties relate solely to the subject-matters of the convention, independently of the individuals of the contracting parties and continue to bind the state, although there may be changes in its constitution or in the individuals of its rulers. Vattel, Law of Nat. b. 2, c. 12, 183-197.

A Law Dictionary Adapted To The Constitution And Laws Of The United States Of America And Of The Several States Of The American Union by John Bouvier Revised Sixth Edition, 1856

TREATY defined: A compact made between two or more independent nations with a view to the public welfare. ...Louis Wolf & Co. v. United States, Cust. & Pat.App., 107 F.2d 819, 827; United States v. 
Belmont, N.Y., 301 U.S. 324, 57 S.Ct. 758, 761, 81 L.Ed. 1134.
   An agreement, league or contract between two or more nations or sovereigns, formally signed by commissioners properly authorized and 
solemnly ratified by the several sovereigns or the supreme power of each state. ...Edye v. Robertson, 112 U.S. 580, 5 S.Ct. 247, 28 L.Ed. 798; Charlton v. Kelly, 229 U.S. 447, 33 S.Ct. 945, 954, 57 L.Ed. 
1274, 46 L.R.A.,N.S., 397.
   A treaty is not only a law but also a contract between two nations and must, if possible, be so construed as to give full force and effect to all its parts. United States v. Reid, C.C.A.Or., 73 F.2d 153, 155. The term has a far more restricted meaning under U.S. Constitution than under international law. ...Weinberger v. Rossi, Dist.Col., 456 U.S. 25, 102 S.Ct. 1510, 1514, 71 L. Ed.2d 715. United States treaties may be made by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. ...Art. II, Sec. 2, U.S. Const.
   States may not enter into treaties (Art. I, Sec. 10, cl. 1) and once made, shall be binding on the states as the supreme law of the land (Art. VI, cl. 2). See Supremacy clause; Treaty clause. Black's Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 1602)

UNCITRAL – United Nations Convention On International Trade Law

Please read article here:
TWO UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONS
http://presscore.ca/two-constitutions-in-the-united-states-1st-was-illegally- suspended-in-favor-of-a-vatican-crown-corporation-in-1871.html

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
*